Sovran Gold Logo
JURISDICTION

Sovran Private Society - PCA

Sovau Badge White

“Let there be Light! Let the spirit of Truth light the way to Sovranty.”

Introduction to the Jurisdiction of the Sovran Private Society

The Sovran Private Society operates within a unique jurisdictional framework established on principles of Sovereign Integrity, Common Law, and Indigenous Lawful Traditions. This jurisdiction is distinct from conventional state or corporate legal systems, deriving its authority from the natural rights of its members, spiritual principles, and the foundational laws of the Society’s establishment.

The jurisdiction of the Society is both private and sovereign, designed to uphold the rights and freedoms of its members while ensuring their protections within a decentralized and autonomous legal structure. This framework is recognized under international law and upheld by private contractual agreements among members. Below, we elaborate on the components of this jurisdiction and its implications for members.

Foundation of the Society’s Jurisdiction

1. Sovereign Ecclesiastical Body Politic

The jurisdiction of the Sovran Private Society is rooted in its establishment as a Sovereign Ecclesiastical Body Politic under the auspices of the PanTerraVida Private Society. This ensures that:

2. Recognition of Natural and Indigenous Law

The Society recognizes the inherent rights of all living beings as outlined in natural law and Indigenous lawful traditions. These include:

3. Private Contractual Framework

The Sovran Private Society is governed by private contracts among its members. These agreements:

Implications for Members

1. Protections and Immunities

Members of the Society enjoy the following benefits under its jurisdiction:

2. Responsibilities of Membership

By joining the Society, members agree to:

1. Hale vs. Hinkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906)

This case establishes the distinction between individuals and corporations, affirming that:

“The individual may stand upon his Constitutional Rights as a Citizen… His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the State or to his neighbors to divulge his business or to open his doors to investigation, so far as it may tend to incriminate him.”

This principle underscores the right of members to engage in private contractual relationships free from state interference.

2. Miller vs. U.S., 230 F. 486 (1916)

This ruling confirms:

“The claim and exercise of a constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime.”

This supports the Society’s stance that its members’ exercise of their sovereign rights cannot be subjected to penalties or criminalization.

3. Chicago Motor Coach vs. Chicago, 169 NE 22 (1929)

This case highlights the distinction between rights and privileges:

“The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental Right.”

This affirms the Society’s recognition of the unalienable rights of its members to life, liberty, and property.

4. Gold and Silver as Lawful Money under the U.S. Constitution

Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly states:

“No State shall… make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts.”

This provision emphasizes that only gold and silver coin constitute lawful tender for settling debts, reflecting the framers’ intent to establish a monetary system based on tangible assets for all people. This principle aligns with the Society’s acknowledgment of real, asset-backed monetary systems as foundational to sovereignty and economic integrity.

5. Commerce Among Indigenous Peoples

The sovereignty of Indigenous peoples to engage in trade and exchange within their communities has been consistently upheld in U.S. law:

These rulings affirm that Indigenous peoples possess inherent sovereignty to regulate their economic activities and maintain private systems of trade, exchange, and barter within their communities. The Society mirrors these principles by enabling members to engage in private transactions, free from external jurisdiction.

Relation of Jurisdiction to Society’s Mission

The jurisdiction of the Sovran Private Society is integral to its mission of:

International Recognition of Self-Determination

The Society’s jurisdiction aligns with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on September 13, 2007. This historic declaration serves as a worldwide standard for recognizing and protecting the inherent rights of Indigenous peoples. Key provisions include:

1. Right to Self-Determination

Article 3 affirms:

“Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”

This underscores the Society’s commitment to providing members with autonomy over their governance and development.

2. Autonomy and Governance

Article 4 ensures

“Indigenous peoples, in exercising their right to self-determination, have the right to autonomy or self-government in matters relating to their internal and local affairs.”

The Society’s framework mirrors these principles by allowing members to operate within a sovereign legal structure independent of external systems.

3. Cultural and Spiritual Preservation

Articles 11 and 12 protect:

“The right to practice and revitalize their cultural traditions and customs, including the preservation of sacred sites, artifacts, and ceremonies.”

The Society integrates these principles by safeguarding members’ spiritual practices and cultural heritage.

4. Lands, Territories, and Resources

Articles 25-28 affirm:

“Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and strengthen their spiritual relationship with their traditionally owned or otherwise occupied lands, territories, waters, and resources.”

This aligns with the Society’s acknowledgment of Turtle Island as sacred ancestral land.

These provisions solidify the Society’s adherence to principles of sovereignty, equity, and cultural preservation as foundational to its jurisdiction.

Conclusion and Agreement to Jurisdiction

The jurisdiction of the Sovran Private Society represents a paradigm shift in how individuals and communities govern themselves. By aligning with principles of natural law, Indigenous traditions, and private contract, the Society offers its members a sanctuary of peace, privacy, and autonomy. This framework not only safeguards the rights of its members but also empowers them to live in harmony with universal principles of justice and equity.

By agreeing to this Agreement, the member affirms their status as Stans Ut Sui Juris, standing in their natural and sovereign capacity, and consents to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Sovran Private Society. All disputes, obligations, and rights are governed by the laws and traditions of the Sovran Private Society, under the supreme authority of the Court of the People. If entering this Agreement on behalf of an entity, the member confirms they possess full authority to bind the entity to the terms herein. Should the member lack such authority or disagree with these terms, they may not proceed with participation in the Society.